<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 367 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were eligible for the benefit of exemption notifications for pipes used beyond the first storage facility. The decision was based on the interpretation of the notifications and previous judgments, establishing a consistent application of the law in similar cases. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s arguments and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2019 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 367 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were eligible for the benefit of exemption notifications for pipes used beyond the first storage facility. The decision was based on the interpretation of the notifications and previous judgments, establishing a consistent application of the law in similar cases. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s arguments and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>