https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379634 The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the requirement for the appellant to deposit 25% of the additional tax demand within two months. The court found no merit in the challenges raised by the appellant regarding the reversal of Input Tax Credit on purchase tax and retention of bye products by rice millers. The Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeals for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was upheld, with no legal errors identified. Condonation of delay in refiling the appeal was granted, and the consolidated judgment addressed identical issues in both appeals. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 May 2019 06:54:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379634 The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the requirement for the appellant to deposit 25% of the additional tax demand within two months. The court found no merit in the challenges raised by the appellant regarding the reversal of Input Tax Credit on purchase tax and retention of bye products by rice millers. The Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeals for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was upheld, with no legal errors identified. Condonation of delay in refiling the appeal was granted, and the consolidated judgment addressed identical issues in both appeals. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379634