<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 361 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379633</link>
    <description>Specific tariff entries in the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 controlled the classification of the assessee&#039;s products: face creams and similar cosmetics fell within Entry 41, and toothpaste, tooth powder, hair oils, face powder, talcum powder and toilet soap fell within Entry 49 of Part III of Schedule II. Because the statute itself expressly covered these goods, external classification principles or classifications under another fiscal enactment could not override the statutory entries. The earlier contrary view was treated as per incuriam for failure to notice the relevant schedule entries, and the applicable tax rate was 12% under the specified entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 361 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379633</link>
      <description>Specific tariff entries in the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 controlled the classification of the assessee&#039;s products: face creams and similar cosmetics fell within Entry 41, and toothpaste, tooth powder, hair oils, face powder, talcum powder and toilet soap fell within Entry 49 of Part III of Schedule II. Because the statute itself expressly covered these goods, external classification principles or classifications under another fiscal enactment could not override the statutory entries. The earlier contrary view was treated as per incuriam for failure to notice the relevant schedule entries, and the applicable tax rate was 12% under the specified entries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>