<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 335 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379607</link>
    <description>The ITAT remanded the case back to the ld. CIT(A) for fresh consideration, allowing the Revenue another opportunity to present its case due to conflicting arguments and lack of proof of service of notice under section 143(2). The departmental appeal and cross-objection were allowed for statistical purposes only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 05:47:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 335 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379607</link>
      <description>The ITAT remanded the case back to the ld. CIT(A) for fresh consideration, allowing the Revenue another opportunity to present its case due to conflicting arguments and lack of proof of service of notice under section 143(2). The departmental appeal and cross-objection were allowed for statistical purposes only.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>