<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1515 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280453</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order dated 10/03/2011 was not time-barred under section 201 of the Income Tax Act as it was within the permissible timeframe stipulated by the proviso to section 201(3). The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and reinstated the AO&#039;s order, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 05:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1515 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280453</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order dated 10/03/2011 was not time-barred under section 201 of the Income Tax Act as it was within the permissible timeframe stipulated by the proviso to section 201(3). The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and reinstated the AO&#039;s order, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>