<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1758 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280454</link>
    <description>The appeals by the assessee for assessment years 2000-01 to 2004-05 were allowed, while cross-appeals by the revenue for the same years were dismissed. The revenue&#039;s appeals against orders passed under Section 201(1A) for the same years were also dismissed. Additionally, the revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2007-08 was partly allowed, with the issue of non-payment of tax after deduction restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 05:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1758 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280454</link>
      <description>The appeals by the assessee for assessment years 2000-01 to 2004-05 were allowed, while cross-appeals by the revenue for the same years were dismissed. The revenue&#039;s appeals against orders passed under Section 201(1A) for the same years were also dismissed. Additionally, the revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2007-08 was partly allowed, with the issue of non-payment of tax after deduction restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>