<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1354 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280431</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing comparables must be functionally similar and supported by disclosed reasoning; unrelated businesses such as engineering, testing, foreign exchange, travel, or container freight services cannot be introduced without a clear basis. On the facts described, exclusion of the impugned comparables brought the assessee&#039;s margin within the permissible range, so the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted. The text also notes that an Assessing Officer must implement a binding Dispute Resolution Panel direction allowing deduction under section 80G, and failure to do so is not justified. The officer was directed to pass the consequential order within the stated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2019 08:43:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1354 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280431</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing comparables must be functionally similar and supported by disclosed reasoning; unrelated businesses such as engineering, testing, foreign exchange, travel, or container freight services cannot be introduced without a clear basis. On the facts described, exclusion of the impugned comparables brought the assessee&#039;s margin within the permissible range, so the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted. The text also notes that an Assessing Officer must implement a binding Dispute Resolution Panel direction allowing deduction under section 80G, and failure to do so is not justified. The officer was directed to pass the consequential order within the stated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>