<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1354 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280431</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on the primary issue of the addition under Chapter X of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to comply with the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s order regarding the deduction under section 80G. The issue of charging interest under section 234 of the Income Tax Act was considered consequential. The order was pronounced on April 12, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2019 08:43:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1354 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280431</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on the primary issue of the addition under Chapter X of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to comply with the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s order regarding the deduction under section 80G. The issue of charging interest under section 234 of the Income Tax Act was considered consequential. The order was pronounced on April 12, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>