https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280440 The Court held that the arbitration agreement was valid and enforceable despite pending proceedings under the RDB Act. It ruled that the DRT's jurisdiction does not bar arbitration, especially when arbitration began prior to the DRT application. The Court appointed an arbitrator and ordered the arbitration to proceed, emphasizing the binding nature of cited precedents. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 May 2019 08:43:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280440 The Court held that the arbitration agreement was valid and enforceable despite pending proceedings under the RDB Act. It ruled that the DRT's jurisdiction does not bar arbitration, especially when arbitration began prior to the DRT application. The Court appointed an arbitrator and ordered the arbitration to proceed, emphasizing the binding nature of cited precedents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280440