https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280451 The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a Notification under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, conflicting with Central legislation and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The High Court of Bombay at Goa invalidated the Notification, declaring certain Penal Code sections cognizable and non-bailable in the Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu. The Supreme Court disagreed, citing the General Clauses Act to save notifications under the old Code. It upheld the Notification's validity, following precedents from various High Courts, reviving the FIR and charge-sheet in question. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 May 2019 08:43:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280451 The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a Notification under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, conflicting with Central legislation and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The High Court of Bombay at Goa invalidated the Notification, declaring certain Penal Code sections cognizable and non-bailable in the Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu. The Supreme Court disagreed, citing the General Clauses Act to save notifications under the old Code. It upheld the Notification's validity, following precedents from various High Courts, reviving the FIR and charge-sheet in question. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280451