<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 327 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the re-characterization of the subsidy income and the use of the CUP method for benchmarking international transactions. The other related issues were rendered academic or directed for fresh verification by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was thus partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2019 08:43:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 327 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the re-characterization of the subsidy income and the use of the CUP method for benchmarking international transactions. The other related issues were rendered academic or directed for fresh verification by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was thus partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>