https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280423 The Supreme Court interpreted Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act liberally, ruling in favor of the workman terminated by American Express International Banking Corporation. The Court held that all days during which the employee was in employment and paid wages should be considered for calculating continuous service, emphasizing the objective of providing relief to retrenched workmen. Referring to precedents, the Court highlighted the need for a broad interpretation of welfare statutes and employee rights provisions. Consequently, the Court ordered the workman's reinstatement with full back wages and awarded costs to the appellants, prioritizing the protection of employee rights in industrial disputes. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 May 2019 14:27:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280423 The Supreme Court interpreted Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act liberally, ruling in favor of the workman terminated by American Express International Banking Corporation. The Court held that all days during which the employee was in employment and paid wages should be considered for calculating continuous service, emphasizing the objective of providing relief to retrenched workmen. Referring to precedents, the Court highlighted the need for a broad interpretation of welfare statutes and employee rights provisions. Consequently, the Court ordered the workman's reinstatement with full back wages and awarded costs to the appellants, prioritizing the protection of employee rights in industrial disputes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280423