https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280421 The Supreme Court reinstated the trial court's sentences of six months under Section 7 and one year under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, to run concurrently. The Court rejected the application of Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for probation, emphasizing that the Act's provisions do not allow for such leniency. Additionally, the Court clarified the interpretation of Section 71 IPC and Section 220 Cr.P.C., stating that a single act can lead to multiple convictions but should not result in a more severe punishment than warranted for any one offense. en-us Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 May 2019 12:53:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280421 The Supreme Court reinstated the trial court's sentences of six months under Section 7 and one year under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, to run concurrently. The Court rejected the application of Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for probation, emphasizing that the Act's provisions do not allow for such leniency. Additionally, the Court clarified the interpretation of Section 71 IPC and Section 220 Cr.P.C., stating that a single act can lead to multiple convictions but should not result in a more severe punishment than warranted for any one offense. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280421