<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1207 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280419</link>
    <description>A notification under Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 declaring Section 506(i) IPC non-bailable in Tamil Nadu was treated as a declaration under a Central statute, not as a mere local amendment to the repealed Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. The Court noted that, unless withdrawn, such a declaration could continue after the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 came into force, but also recorded conflicting High Court views and an earlier Division Bench order leaving the issue open. The legal controversy was referred to the Chief Justice for consideration by a Division Bench, and interim anticipatory bail was granted pending authoritative determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2019 12:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1207 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280419</link>
      <description>A notification under Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 declaring Section 506(i) IPC non-bailable in Tamil Nadu was treated as a declaration under a Central statute, not as a mere local amendment to the repealed Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. The Court noted that, unless withdrawn, such a declaration could continue after the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 came into force, but also recorded conflicting High Court views and an earlier Division Bench order leaving the issue open. The legal controversy was referred to the Chief Justice for consideration by a Division Bench, and interim anticipatory bail was granted pending authoritative determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>