https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280418 Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 empowered the State Government to notify specified offences, including Sections 506 and 507 IPC, as cognizable and non-bailable. The Delhi notification issued in 1933 therefore continued to apply to those offences in the Union Territory. The Court further held that the coming into force of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 did not extinguish the notification, because the saving provision preserved prior notifications and laws then in force. On that basis, the challenge to the FIR and criminal proceedings on the ground that the offences were non-cognizable failed. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 May 2019 12:30:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280418 Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 empowered the State Government to notify specified offences, including Sections 506 and 507 IPC, as cognizable and non-bailable. The Delhi notification issued in 1933 therefore continued to apply to those offences in the Union Territory. The Court further held that the coming into force of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 did not extinguish the notification, because the saving provision preserved prior notifications and laws then in force. On that basis, the challenge to the FIR and criminal proceedings on the ground that the offences were non-cognizable failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280418