<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 211 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280417</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, which allows the State Government to declare certain offences cognizable and non-bailable in specific areas, is not ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution. The notifications issued under Section 10 were deemed valid and applicable to the area where the offence was committed. The court dismissed the petition and discharged the rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2019 12:26:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 211 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280417</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932, which allows the State Government to declare certain offences cognizable and non-bailable in specific areas, is not ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution. The notifications issued under Section 10 were deemed valid and applicable to the area where the offence was committed. The court dismissed the petition and discharged the rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>