https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280417 Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 was upheld as a valid territorial classification under Article 14 because the legislative policy targeted local law-and-order conditions and had a rational nexus with its object. Notifications making offences under Section 506 IPC cognizable and non-bailable were held applicable to the locality where the offence occurred when the relevant municipal and later village-area notifications were read together. References in those notifications to the repealed Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 were treated as continuing references to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 under the General Clauses Act, so the notifications remained operative. The challenge to the provision and notifications failed. en-us Fri, 18 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 May 2019 12:26:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280417 Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 was upheld as a valid territorial classification under Article 14 because the legislative policy targeted local law-and-order conditions and had a rational nexus with its object. Notifications making offences under Section 506 IPC cognizable and non-bailable were held applicable to the locality where the offence occurred when the relevant municipal and later village-area notifications were read together. References in those notifications to the repealed Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 were treated as continuing references to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 under the General Clauses Act, so the notifications remained operative. The challenge to the provision and notifications failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280417