<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 326 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379598</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the seizure and cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s liquor license. It directed the licensing authority to refund the basic license fee and security money, deducting the fee for the period the petitioner operated the shop. The court also imposed a cost of Rs. 20,000 on the respondents for the harassment caused by their actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2019 06:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 326 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379598</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition challenging the seizure and cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s liquor license. It directed the licensing authority to refund the basic license fee and security money, deducting the fee for the period the petitioner operated the shop. The court also imposed a cost of Rs. 20,000 on the respondents for the harassment caused by their actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>