https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379596 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the necessity of allowing cross-examination of witnesses to uphold natural justice principles. The appellant's denial of the opportunity to cross-examine a crucial witness was deemed a violation of fair hearing standards. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for further proceedings, including the cross-examination of witnesses. This decision underscores the significance of procedural fairness and the right to cross-examine witnesses in legal and administrative proceedings. en-us Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 May 2019 06:36:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379596 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the necessity of allowing cross-examination of witnesses to uphold natural justice principles. The appellant's denial of the opportunity to cross-examine a crucial witness was deemed a violation of fair hearing standards. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for further proceedings, including the cross-examination of witnesses. This decision underscores the significance of procedural fairness and the right to cross-examine witnesses in legal and administrative proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379596