<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379582</link>
    <description>The Court denied the anticipatory bail petitions filed by a husband and wife duo involved in various business entities under the CGST Act. The Court found prima facie evidence of fraudulent activities, including circular trading and wrongful Input Tax Credit availed through false E-way bills. Emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation, the Court dismissed the petitions, allowing the department to proceed with their investigation as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379582</link>
      <description>The Court denied the anticipatory bail petitions filed by a husband and wife duo involved in various business entities under the CGST Act. The Court found prima facie evidence of fraudulent activities, including circular trading and wrongful Input Tax Credit availed through false E-way bills. Emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation, the Court dismissed the petitions, allowing the department to proceed with their investigation as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>