<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 306 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379578</link>
    <description>The High Court found the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order lacking in reasoning and directed a fresh decision considering the petitioner&#039;s grievances, lifting the bank account attachment immediately. While the tax amount already recovered would not be refunded yet, no further recovery would occur for two weeks after the new order is communicated to the petitioner, providing temporary relief during the ongoing legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 306 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379578</link>
      <description>The High Court found the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order lacking in reasoning and directed a fresh decision considering the petitioner&#039;s grievances, lifting the bank account attachment immediately. While the tax amount already recovered would not be refunded yet, no further recovery would occur for two weeks after the new order is communicated to the petitioner, providing temporary relief during the ongoing legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>