<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 300 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379572</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the notice, order, and the judgment of the Single Judge. The Court held that the show cause notice lacked specificity and clarity, failing to provide a reasonable opportunity for the appellants to respond effectively. The Court emphasized the importance of clear particulars in any future notice to enable the appellants to present their case adequately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 300 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379572</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the notice, order, and the judgment of the Single Judge. The Court held that the show cause notice lacked specificity and clarity, failing to provide a reasonable opportunity for the appellants to respond effectively. The Court emphasized the importance of clear particulars in any future notice to enable the appellants to present their case adequately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>