<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 290 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379562</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, addressing transfer pricing adjustment, disallowance of channel placement fee, and short credit of TDS issues. The tribunal excluded a company as comparable for transfer pricing, ruled channel placement fee not royalty, and directed credit for TDS as per law. Consequential and premature issues were dismissed. The judgment provided detailed analysis and referenced legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 290 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379562</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, addressing transfer pricing adjustment, disallowance of channel placement fee, and short credit of TDS issues. The tribunal excluded a company as comparable for transfer pricing, ruled channel placement fee not royalty, and directed credit for TDS as per law. Consequential and premature issues were dismissed. The judgment provided detailed analysis and referenced legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>