<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 280 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379552</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delayed filing of the appeal due to sufficient cause and allowed the appeal for adjudication. Regarding the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal remitted the penalty issue back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration after the quantum addition was decided. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, addressing both the delay in filing the appeal and the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 09:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 280 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379552</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delayed filing of the appeal due to sufficient cause and allowed the appeal for adjudication. Regarding the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal remitted the penalty issue back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration after the quantum addition was decided. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, addressing both the delay in filing the appeal and the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>