https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379540 The appeal involved the denial of CENVAT credit on outdoor catering services and the imposition of interest and penalty on a consulting engineering company. The Member (Judicial) referred to a Larger Bench Tribunal decision, determining the appellant's eligibility to avail CENVAT credit for the disputed period (April 2007 to March 2011). Relying on the precedent set by the Larger Bench, the Member concluded in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the Commissioner's order. The decision clarified the legislative exclusion of certain services post-amendment in April 2011. en-us Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 May 2019 06:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379540 The appeal involved the denial of CENVAT credit on outdoor catering services and the imposition of interest and penalty on a consulting engineering company. The Member (Judicial) referred to a Larger Bench Tribunal decision, determining the appellant's eligibility to avail CENVAT credit for the disputed period (April 2007 to March 2011). Relying on the precedent set by the Larger Bench, the Member concluded in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the Commissioner's order. The decision clarified the legislative exclusion of certain services post-amendment in April 2011. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379540