https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379538 The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax on the amount paid under the Representative Office Agreement could not be sustained on merits. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs. The Tribunal also found that the extended period of limitation was not applicable due to the revenue-neutral nature of the transaction and the lack of suppression of facts. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Nov 2019 18:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379538 The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax on the amount paid under the Representative Office Agreement could not be sustained on merits. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs. The Tribunal also found that the extended period of limitation was not applicable due to the revenue-neutral nature of the transaction and the lack of suppression of facts. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379538