<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 41 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17962</link>
    <description>The court determined that the assessee&#039;s X-ray clinic qualifies as an industrial undertaking engaged in manufacturing or producing articles, satisfying the conditions for investment allowance under section 32A. Regarding the classification of the activity as a business or profession, the court remanded the case to the Tribunal for a proper determination based on the nature of the activity. The court did not consider the argument regarding the eligibility of X-ray machines under the Eleventh Schedule, leaving it open for the Tribunal to address if raised appropriately. The matter was remanded back to the Tribunal for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:07:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 41 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17962</link>
      <description>The court determined that the assessee&#039;s X-ray clinic qualifies as an industrial undertaking engaged in manufacturing or producing articles, satisfying the conditions for investment allowance under section 32A. Regarding the classification of the activity as a business or profession, the court remanded the case to the Tribunal for a proper determination based on the nature of the activity. The court did not consider the argument regarding the eligibility of X-ray machines under the Eleventh Schedule, leaving it open for the Tribunal to address if raised appropriately. The matter was remanded back to the Tribunal for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>