<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 255 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379527</link>
    <description>The court rectified typographical errors in the final order, ensuring accurate legal interpretation. The judgment corrected errors in references, regulatory interpretations, and adjudicating authority actions. It clarified tax liability, credit availed, surrender/discontinuance charges, and the definition of &quot;service.&quot; The rectification aimed to maintain procedural integrity, fair treatment, and consistency in legal interpretations, emphasizing precise language and adherence to regulations for just outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2019 06:06:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 255 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379527</link>
      <description>The court rectified typographical errors in the final order, ensuring accurate legal interpretation. The judgment corrected errors in references, regulatory interpretations, and adjudicating authority actions. It clarified tax liability, credit availed, surrender/discontinuance charges, and the definition of &quot;service.&quot; The rectification aimed to maintain procedural integrity, fair treatment, and consistency in legal interpretations, emphasizing precise language and adherence to regulations for just outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>