<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 253 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379525</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore upheld the appeal of the assessee and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the rejection of cenvat credit for transportation services. The Tribunal found the assessee eligible for credit based on relevant legal provisions and circulars, emphasizing the consistent interpretation and reliance on previous decisions. The impugned order was deemed sustainable, highlighting the proper appreciation of facts and law, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2019 06:06:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 253 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379525</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore upheld the appeal of the assessee and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the rejection of cenvat credit for transportation services. The Tribunal found the assessee eligible for credit based on relevant legal provisions and circulars, emphasizing the consistent interpretation and reliance on previous decisions. The impugned order was deemed sustainable, highlighting the proper appreciation of facts and law, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>