https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280400 Article 226 jurisdiction was held available where the pleadings and reliefs showed that the challenge was not confined to supervisory control under Article 227, so a mere reference to Article 227 did not defeat appellate maintainability. The Court further stated that review power under Section 51 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 must be exercised within a reasonable time and cannot be used to unsettle a concluded lease or vested rights after the grantee has acted on a registered lease and incurred expenditure. Mutation entries were treated as summary revenue records that do not create title, while any title dispute or acquisition issue had to be pursued in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 08 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 May 2019 11:08:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280400 Article 226 jurisdiction was held available where the pleadings and reliefs showed that the challenge was not confined to supervisory control under Article 227, so a mere reference to Article 227 did not defeat appellate maintainability. The Court further stated that review power under Section 51 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 must be exercised within a reasonable time and cannot be used to unsettle a concluded lease or vested rights after the grantee has acted on a registered lease and incurred expenditure. Mutation entries were treated as summary revenue records that do not create title, while any title dispute or acquisition issue had to be pursued in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280400