https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379490 The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of steel ingots. The Commissioner (Appeals) had previously allowed the assessee's appeal due to insufficient evidence and denial of procedural rights. However, the Tribunal found that the existence of double invoices and discrepancies in stock registers provided substantial evidence of clandestine activity. As a result, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to reassess the demand based on the unchallenged evidence of double invoices, partially granting the Revenue's appeal. en-us Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 May 2019 10:27:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379490 The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of steel ingots. The Commissioner (Appeals) had previously allowed the assessee's appeal due to insufficient evidence and denial of procedural rights. However, the Tribunal found that the existence of double invoices and discrepancies in stock registers provided substantial evidence of clandestine activity. As a result, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to reassess the demand based on the unchallenged evidence of double invoices, partially granting the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379490