https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379484 The Tribunal determined that the assessable value for goods cleared to sister concerns and for self-use in expansion projects should be calculated under Rule 4 read with Rule 11 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The demand was upheld but limited to the normal period, and penalties were revoked due to the lack of suppression or misstatement. The appeal was partially granted based on these findings. en-us Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 May 2019 09:49:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379484 The Tribunal determined that the assessable value for goods cleared to sister concerns and for self-use in expansion projects should be calculated under Rule 4 read with Rule 11 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The demand was upheld but limited to the normal period, and penalties were revoked due to the lack of suppression or misstatement. The appeal was partially granted based on these findings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379484