https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379474 An insurer may differ from a surveyor's report only for valid, recorded reasons, and cannot appoint successive surveyors as a routine measure to obtain a claim repudiation. The first survey report was not shown to be defective, so the repudiation based on later reports lacked justification and was not sustained. The compensation award was affirmed, and the claimant was also entitled to interest for delayed payment; interest was granted at 6% per annum from the date of filing until payment. en-us Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 May 2019 09:28:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379474 An insurer may differ from a surveyor's report only for valid, recorded reasons, and cannot appoint successive surveyors as a routine measure to obtain a claim repudiation. The first survey report was not shown to be defective, so the repudiation based on later reports lacked justification and was not sustained. The compensation award was affirmed, and the claimant was also entitled to interest for delayed payment; interest was granted at 6% per annum from the date of filing until payment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379474