<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 10 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17947</link>
    <description>Prosecution of a company&#039;s secretary or other principal officer for tax contraventions remains maintainable where the company is alleged to have committed the offence, even if the company has been discharged at a pre-evidence stage rather than acquitted on merits. The statutory scheme under the Income-tax Act treats a company as capable of committing the contravention and permits proceeding against the person in charge once responsibility is established by notice or other statutory conditions. Non-prosecution or discharge of the company does not, by itself, bar liability of the principal officer for offences relating to failure to deposit tax deducted at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:16:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 10 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17947</link>
      <description>Prosecution of a company&#039;s secretary or other principal officer for tax contraventions remains maintainable where the company is alleged to have committed the offence, even if the company has been discharged at a pre-evidence stage rather than acquitted on merits. The statutory scheme under the Income-tax Act treats a company as capable of committing the contravention and permits proceeding against the person in charge once responsibility is established by notice or other statutory conditions. Non-prosecution or discharge of the company does not, by itself, bar liability of the principal officer for offences relating to failure to deposit tax deducted at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>