<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal&#039;s Order Challenged for Lack of Factual Findings on Share Sale Income; Case Remanded for Review.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46247</link>
    <description>Non recording of finding of facts - income from sale of shares - What the assessee had to prove before the lower adjudication authorities was that it continued to be an investor in current AY. This finding of fact has not been entered at any stage of the proceedings. - impugned order of the tribunal is erroneous and perverse, give rise a substantial question of law - matter remanded</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 09:00:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 09:00:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal&#039;s Order Challenged for Lack of Factual Findings on Share Sale Income; Case Remanded for Review.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46247</link>
      <description>Non recording of finding of facts - income from sale of shares - What the assessee had to prove before the lower adjudication authorities was that it continued to be an investor in current AY. This finding of fact has not been entered at any stage of the proceedings. - impugned order of the tribunal is erroneous and perverse, give rise a substantial question of law - matter remanded</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 09:00:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>