<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 92 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17942</link>
    <description>Consideration paid to the State for grant of exclusive privilege to manufacture country liquor is price for parting with an intoxicating privilege, not a tax, duty, fee or cess. The levy under the Bengal Excise Act and the rules made thereunder lacked the quid pro quo characteristic of a technical fee and was not a statutory impost within section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, non-payment of that amount did not attract the section 43B bar to deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 92 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17942</link>
      <description>Consideration paid to the State for grant of exclusive privilege to manufacture country liquor is price for parting with an intoxicating privilege, not a tax, duty, fee or cess. The levy under the Bengal Excise Act and the rules made thereunder lacked the quid pro quo characteristic of a technical fee and was not a statutory impost within section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, non-payment of that amount did not attract the section 43B bar to deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>