<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1960 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for disallowance of expenses, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed solely on disallowances if the expenses were genuinely claimed and not fraudulent. The decision highlighted the importance of distinguishing between genuine claims and fraudulent activities to prevent unjust penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 08:55:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1960 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for disallowance of expenses, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed solely on disallowances if the expenses were genuinely claimed and not fraudulent. The decision highlighted the importance of distinguishing between genuine claims and fraudulent activities to prevent unjust penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>