<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1671 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow the expenditure claimed for ROC fees, considering it as capital expenditure due to business operations not commencing. The Tribunal referenced Supreme Court cases to support this view, concluding that the expenditure was not allowable as a deduction under the relevant provisions for the assessment year 2009-10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 08:55:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1671 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow the expenditure claimed for ROC fees, considering it as capital expenditure due to business operations not commencing. The Tribunal referenced Supreme Court cases to support this view, concluding that the expenditure was not allowable as a deduction under the relevant provisions for the assessment year 2009-10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>