https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379429 The appeal involved challenges regarding the denial of CENVAT credit for Service Tax payment under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) and on certain input services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal except for July 2012, where cash payment was required due to a restriction on CENVAT credit utilization for RCM Service Tax payment. The Tribunal found a nexus between the input services and output services, citing relevant precedents and legal arguments. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was partly allowed based on the Tribunal's analysis and legal reasoning. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 May 2019 17:47:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379429 The appeal involved challenges regarding the denial of CENVAT credit for Service Tax payment under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) and on certain input services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal except for July 2012, where cash payment was required due to a restriction on CENVAT credit utilization for RCM Service Tax payment. The Tribunal found a nexus between the input services and output services, citing relevant precedents and legal arguments. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was partly allowed based on the Tribunal's analysis and legal reasoning. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379429