<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 150 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379422</link>
    <description>Minor defects in transporter declarations did not justify denial of 75% service tax abatement where the declarations showed no Cenvat credit had been taken and their genuineness was not disputed. The Tribunal treated the missing signatories&#039; names as a minor discrepancy and held that an exemption condition introduced through a circular could not override the notification itself. As the dispute turned on interpretation and tax had already been paid on the reduced taxable value after abatement, the remaining demand was not sustainable. Penalties were also found unwarranted on the same facts and were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 17:28:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 150 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379422</link>
      <description>Minor defects in transporter declarations did not justify denial of 75% service tax abatement where the declarations showed no Cenvat credit had been taken and their genuineness was not disputed. The Tribunal treated the missing signatories&#039; names as a minor discrepancy and held that an exemption condition introduced through a circular could not override the notification itself. As the dispute turned on interpretation and tax had already been paid on the reduced taxable value after abatement, the remaining demand was not sustainable. Penalties were also found unwarranted on the same facts and were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>