<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 144 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order regarding the liability of the appellant to pay service tax on rental income received for warehousing and storage of goods. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed its authority to entertain appeals against Orders-in-Revision issued by the Commissioner post-19-08-2009, in the absence of a specific savings clause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 17:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 144 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order regarding the liability of the appellant to pay service tax on rental income received for warehousing and storage of goods. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed its authority to entertain appeals against Orders-in-Revision issued by the Commissioner post-19-08-2009, in the absence of a specific savings clause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>