https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379414 The High Court allowed the appeal challenging the CESTAT order under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Relying on the precedent set in a previous case, the court held that proceedings initiated under old rules could continue even after substitution with new rules. The decision favored the Revenue, emphasizing the significance of Section 38A of the Act in preserving proceedings related to violations committed under old rules. As a result, the appeal was granted in favor of the Revenue, resolving the legal dispute. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379414 The High Court allowed the appeal challenging the CESTAT order under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Relying on the precedent set in a previous case, the court held that proceedings initiated under old rules could continue even after substitution with new rules. The decision favored the Revenue, emphasizing the significance of Section 38A of the Act in preserving proceedings related to violations committed under old rules. As a result, the appeal was granted in favor of the Revenue, resolving the legal dispute. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379414