<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 140 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, confirming the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on construction services for setting up factory premises. It found Rule 3(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, inapplicable, deemed the demand time-barred, and set aside penalties imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 16:47:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 140 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, confirming the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on construction services for setting up factory premises. It found Rule 3(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, inapplicable, deemed the demand time-barred, and set aside penalties imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>