https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379409 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the demand to reverse the credit on inputs and input services in respect of bagasse cannot be sustained. Bagasse, being a residue and not a manufactured product, does not fall under the purview of Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The decision aligned with the Apex Court's clarification that bagasse is not excisable due to the absence of a manufacturing process, providing relief to the appellants in this case. en-us Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 May 2019 16:46:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379409 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the demand to reverse the credit on inputs and input services in respect of bagasse cannot be sustained. Bagasse, being a residue and not a manufactured product, does not fall under the purview of Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The decision aligned with the Apex Court's clarification that bagasse is not excisable due to the absence of a manufacturing process, providing relief to the appellants in this case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379409