<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 126 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379398</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the impugned order in a case involving a dispute over excise duty on petroleum products, rejecting appeals by both the revenue and the assessee. The judgment emphasized adherence to valuation rules for determining excise duty liabilities and highlighted penalties for contravention, emphasizing the significance of following such rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 126 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379398</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the impugned order in a case involving a dispute over excise duty on petroleum products, rejecting appeals by both the revenue and the assessee. The judgment emphasized adherence to valuation rules for determining excise duty liabilities and highlighted penalties for contravention, emphasizing the significance of following such rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>