<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379386</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the new unit set up in Haryana for manufacturing door frames was not an expansion of the existing business. Consequently, interest on borrowings for the new unit was not allowed as a deduction since production had not commenced. The Court also found that Section 14A applied, allowing the Assessing Officer to disallow expenditure related to exempt income. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379386</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the new unit set up in Haryana for manufacturing door frames was not an expansion of the existing business. Consequently, interest on borrowings for the new unit was not allowed as a deduction since production had not commenced. The Court also found that Section 14A applied, allowing the Assessing Officer to disallow expenditure related to exempt income. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>