<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 106 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 54F as the investment in the new residential flat was made within the prescribed time limit, despite the sale consideration not being deposited in a capital account before the due date. Relying on decisions of the Karnataka High Court and ITAT, Ahmedabad, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the AO to grant the exemption under section 54F.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 07:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 106 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 54F as the investment in the new residential flat was made within the prescribed time limit, despite the sale consideration not being deposited in a capital account before the due date. Relying on decisions of the Karnataka High Court and ITAT, Ahmedabad, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the AO to grant the exemption under section 54F.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>