<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379377</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars was not justified as there was no evidence proving false explanation by the assessee. The penalty was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 07:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 105 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379377</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars was not justified as there was no evidence proving false explanation by the assessee. The penalty was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>