<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 98 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to partly delete the addition made by the AO under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that furnishing PAN suffices for TDS exemption under section 194C(6) and non-compliance with section 194C(7) does not automatically trigger disallowance. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on April 26, 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 98 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to partly delete the addition made by the AO under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that furnishing PAN suffices for TDS exemption under section 194C(6) and non-compliance with section 194C(7) does not automatically trigger disallowance. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on April 26, 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>