<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1614 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280372</link>
    <description>The appellants, registered under the Service Tax Department, faced issues regarding service tax liability in multiple categories and reversal of CENVAT credit. Penalties and demands were confirmed by the Original Authority for the period in question. However, the Bench set aside penalties where tax amounts were discharged before the Show Cause Notice, citing legal precedents. Additionally, demands under reverse charge mechanism and extended period for Manpower Recruitment Services were also set aside based on revenue neutrality and conflicting interpretations, respectively. The appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, considering arguments and legal precedents presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 07:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1614 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280372</link>
      <description>The appellants, registered under the Service Tax Department, faced issues regarding service tax liability in multiple categories and reversal of CENVAT credit. Penalties and demands were confirmed by the Original Authority for the period in question. However, the Bench set aside penalties where tax amounts were discharged before the Show Cause Notice, citing legal precedents. Additionally, demands under reverse charge mechanism and extended period for Manpower Recruitment Services were also set aside based on revenue neutrality and conflicting interpretations, respectively. The appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, considering arguments and legal precedents presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>