<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 50 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17921</link>
    <description>For valuation of a let out house property under the Gift-tax Act for an earlier assessment year, the open-market value was to be determined under section 6 as it then stood, and the rental or yield method was treated as a recognised way to arrive at that value. The commentary notes that rule 10 of the Gift-tax Rules did not then incorporate the later wealth-tax linkage, but that did not prevent adoption of a rental basis where appropriate. It further explains that the Tribunal&#039;s remand for fresh valuation on that basis was consistent with accepted valuation principles, and later wealth-tax jurisprudence was treated as supporting, rather than excluding, the method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:11:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 50 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17921</link>
      <description>For valuation of a let out house property under the Gift-tax Act for an earlier assessment year, the open-market value was to be determined under section 6 as it then stood, and the rental or yield method was treated as a recognised way to arrive at that value. The commentary notes that rule 10 of the Gift-tax Rules did not then incorporate the later wealth-tax linkage, but that did not prevent adoption of a rental basis where appropriate. It further explains that the Tribunal&#039;s remand for fresh valuation on that basis was consistent with accepted valuation principles, and later wealth-tax jurisprudence was treated as supporting, rather than excluding, the method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>