https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280354 Adverse judicial remarks against a judicial officer must be necessary to the decision, supported by the record, and made with restraint; where criticism is unnecessary and issued without giving the officer an opportunity to explain, it is unwarranted. The Court found that the remarks against the officer were not required for deciding the appeal and that the direction to place the judgment in his personal service record and before the Inspecting Judge could prejudice his career. The remarks and consequential directions were therefore ordered to be expunged. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2019 17:28:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280354 Adverse judicial remarks against a judicial officer must be necessary to the decision, supported by the record, and made with restraint; where criticism is unnecessary and issued without giving the officer an opportunity to explain, it is unwarranted. The Court found that the remarks against the officer were not required for deciding the appeal and that the direction to place the judgment in his personal service record and before the Inspecting Judge could prejudice his career. The remarks and consequential directions were therefore ordered to be expunged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280354